Latest News Headlines

Evidence in Linda O’Leary trial shows other vessel’s lights were off at time of boat crash, defence says


Overwhelming proof exhibiting one other vessel’s lights were off at the time Linda O’Leary crashed into it means she should not be discovered responsible in the lethal boat collision, her lawyer argued in courtroom Thursday.

In closing arguments of the provincial courtroom trial, Brian Greenspan stated his shopper must be exonerated in the August 2019 crash on Lake Joseph, north of Toronto, that killed two folks.

“She was doing all the right things at the right time when this terrible tragedy occurred,” Greenspan advised the Parry Sound, Ont., courtroom. “The Crown’s case, in our submission, is one of conjecture and speculation.”

Linda O’Leary, the spouse of movie star businessman Kevin O’Leary, has pleaded not responsible to at least one cost of careless operation of a vessel beneath the Canada Shipping Act.

Closing arguments give attention to vessel’s lights

Greenspan argued that it isn’t doable to know the velocity Linda O’Leary was driving, whether or not she was impaired by alcohol at the time or whether or not she was working the boat in a careless method.

He stated his shopper ought to be cleared of duty as a result of the Crown could not show that any of these elements performed a task in her actions.

He additionally advised courtroom that there’s robust video and witness proof that the lights of the other vessel — a Nautique — were off at the time of the crash.

“There can be no rational, reasonable evidential foundation for a suggestion that the Nautique was anything other than invisible to Mrs. O’Leary on that dark, moonless night,” Greenspan advised the courtroom.

The Crown argued, nonetheless, that defence testimony from Kevin O’Leary revealed that the couple were not searching for the chance of unlit objects on the water, as they need to have been.

“They assumed, wrongly, that if they didn’t see any lights, there was nothing in their way. This is clearly in contravention of the collision regulations and a breach of Linda’s duty to not operate her vessel in a careless manner,” federal prosecutor Samir Adam advised the courtroom.

Adam made the case Thursday that given the pitch-black darkness of the evening, Linda O’Leary ought to have been driving slower than the “planing” velocity her husband testified they were travelling at. Not doing so, Adam stated, constituted careless operation of the boat beneath the circumstances.

He additionally pointed to Kevin O’Leary’s assertion to police and courtroom testimony that he might see the other boat when it was “at a distance of five feet” as proof that the other boat was not invisible, because the defence has maintained.

Kevin O’Leary says he noticed ‘zero gentle’ from other vessel

The query of whether or not the other boat had its lights on has been some extent of rivalry in the case.

Kevin O’Leary testified in his spouse’s defence Wednesday, saying he noticed “zero light” coming from the other vessel concerned in the late-night crash on Lake Joseph till after the collision.

The former “Dragon’s Den” star was a passenger on the household’s pilot boat at the time of the crash, together with one other good friend who was injured.

Witnesses on the other boat, together with the proprietor who was charged in the crash with failing to exhibit a navigation gentle, testified that they remembered some lights being on.

But Greenspan stated the testimony of these witnesses ought to be handled with warning.

He argued the decide ought to reject their proof as a result of it would not line up with video exhibiting the lights on the practically 5 metre-long Nautique vessel were off at the time of the crash, or with testimony from witnesses at the O’Leary cottage who stated they noticed the other boat’s lights activate solely after the crash.

Greenspan additionally pointed to witness testimony from Linda O’Leary’s husband saying she was an skilled and cautious boater, and adopted correct security precautions that evening.

O’Leary stated he did not recall if spouse drank earlier than crash 

Kevin O’Leary additionally testified that he didn’t recall if his spouse had consumed alcohol in the hours earlier than the crash.

Court earlier heard testimony from a police officer who stated Linda O’Leary registered an “alert range” stage of blood alcohol on a breath check taken shortly after the crash. The officer stated Linda O’Leary advised her she had solely had one drink after the crash.

Greenspan argued Thursday that the Crown doesn’t have proof to show the that means of that alert check end result or whether or not it impacted his shopper’s boating.

He additionally pointed to video proof of her leaving a cocktail party at one other cottage simply earlier than the late evening crash in which she gave the impression to be functioning usually.

Gary Poltash, 64, of Florida, and Suzana Brito, 48, from Uxbridge, Ont., died from their accidents after the crash and three others were additionally harm.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.